It emphasized close reading, particularly of poetry, to discover how a work of literature functioned as a selfcontained, selfreferential aesthetic object. Many people consider russian formalism to be the predecessor of the new criticism. Russian formalism was a literary movement a school of literary criticism that emerged in former soviet union in early phase of 20 th century. Sebok argues that formalism followed from the central tenets of classical positivism, and that both schools of. The field of literary criticism has been moulded by various criticisms like mimetic criticism, pragmatic criticism, expressive criticism, historical criticism, biographical criticism, sociological criticism, psychological criticism and archetypal. I have an art summer assignment that involves the 2 theories of art emotionalism and formalism. It is a school of literary criticism that originated in. It should be a meaningless term if we take form to be shape with meaning. Through a comparative analysis, this paper tries to discuss two major differences between new criticism and russian formalism. Russian formalism stressed that what a piece of literature means cannot be dismissed from how it says it. Based on the view that a work of art or text is a concrete object that can be analyzed to discover its meaning independent of its authors intention.
Its terminology continues as the basis for most literary education in the united states, and other critical approaches to reading and critiquing literature depend. Formalism, realism, legal process, and fundamental rights. New critics may find tension, irony, or paradox in this relation, but they usually resolve it into unity and coherence of meaning biddle 100. Movements of critical thinking between formalism and historicism, along with the ceaseless interrogation of the two polar terms themselves, may fairly be said to define the range of possibility within which all literary reading occurs. All kinds of formalism have a tendency to consider t. I know that emotionalism focuses on emotions and portrayals of them and formalism is all about color, shape and form. New criticism, incorporating formalism, examines the relationships between a texts ideas and its form, between what a text says and the way it says it. Get an answer for what are the similarities and differences between formalism, structuralism, and new criticism. The presentation explicates the school of theory and analysis which emerged around 1915 in russia and aimed teo create the science of literature. The american new critics by nasrullah mambrol on march 17, 2016 1. What are the main differences between russian formalism and new.
Between formalism and historicism oxford handbooks. What are the basic differences between russian formalism and new criticism. American new criticism, emerging in the 1920s and especially dominant in the 1940s and 1950s, is equivalent to the establishing of the new professional criticism in the emerging discipline of english in british higher education during the interwar period. But when i look for examples of these it can be hard to distinguish between the two. The difference between russian formalism and anglo american formalism or new criticism lies in the formers focus on purely literary devices. What are the main differences between russian formalism and new criticism. Study flashcards on literary criticism new criticism and russian formalism at.
Formalism, innovative 20thcentury russian school of literary criticism. Formalism is a form of literary theory and literary criticism that mainly deals with the structure of a particular text. It rejects the external influence such as authorship, culture, and social influence, and focuses on the mode, form, genre. New criticism is an example of a formalist theory or method of literary criticism. A comparative analysis of new criticism and russian formalism. The concept of affective fallacy is a direct attack on impressionistic criticism, which argues that the readers response. This is far from the truth, and exactly opposite to what motivated the members of the group to develop and promote the new criticism. It includes the work of a number of highly influential russian and soviet scholars such as viktor shklovsky, yuri tynianov, vladimir propp, boris eichenbaum, roman jakobson, boris tomashevsky, grigory gukovsky who revolutionised literary criticism between 1914 and the 1930s by establishing the. The intense focus on the literary text as such is something that new criticism had in common with russian formalism. Russian formalism and angloamerican new criticism by ewa m. The new criticism is an angloamerican variety of formalism that emerged in the 1920s and dominated teaching and scholarship until the early 1960s. Russian formalism and angloamerican new criticism a.
The origins of reflection on the nature, the task, and the formal aspects of literature can be found in ancient greece. Formalism and new criticism by anastasia woods on prezi. Formalism and new criticism formalism is a literary theory that was spearheaded by two main bodies russian formalists and new critics which focused on understanding the literary text through the text itself. Russian formalism and marxist criticism had a seismic impact on twentiethcentury literary theory and the shockwaves are still felt today. This theory analyses and interprets a text by focusing on its inherent features. New criticism formalismstructuralism the first critical theory we will examine is called formalism or structuralism known as new criticism today.
Petersburg later leningrad and led by viktor shklovsky. The work of the formalists had a general impact on later developments in structuralism and other theories of narrative. The most famous type of formalism, is the new criticism, was the dominant mode of criticism in english and american universities from the 1930s to 60s and into the 70s and even 80s in australia ryan new criticism. Formalism and new criticism formalism is, as the name implies, an interpretive approach that emphasizes literary form and the study of literary devices within the text. Certain canonical texts can become programmatically associated with certain issues in literary criticism. Where literary criticism is concerned, what are the major differences between russian formalism and new criticism. What are the major differences between russian formalism and.
What is the difference between formalism and logicism. This word is said the same as the standard french word difference difference but is. Difference between formalism and new criticism it should be said that the russian formalists emphasis on form and technique was different in nature from that of the later new critics. What are the basic differences between russian formalism and. Formalism, new criticism, structuralism, poststructuralism.
Victor shklovskys 1914 essay on futurist poetry, the resurrection of the word marked the beginning of russian formalism. The readerresponse theory and new criticism are two entirely different ways of interpreting a piece of literature. The new criticism has often been disparagingly characterised as asocial formalism that divorced literature from its social and historical origins by its insistence on close textual analysis. So please explain in more detail the difference between them and give me some examples of. Literary studies analyze the differences implied in the opposition between practical and poetic language. Now imagine there is a continuum with realism on one end, formalism on the other, and classicism in the middle. It is less a coherent literary theory than a congeries of critical and theoretical approaches all of which agree that the literary work is autonomous, that its unity and meaning are constituted. Russian formalism is the european counterpart of the angloamerican new criticism. How to be productive at home from a remote work veteran. Two schools of formalist literary criticism developed, russian formalism, and soon after angloamerican new criticism. However, when looking at film theories, we very often tend to compare formalism to realism. Formalism, also called russian formalism, russian russky formalism, innovative 20thcentury russian school of literary criticism. For the russian formalists the theme of the work existed simply to make possible the authors play with the technique.
Both theories aim at deriving meaning, not from content, but in the structure and form of literature. Literary criticism 336 eng iirussian formalism dr mohammed fahmy raiayh 2. Russian formalism also affords some importance to the texts language and structure. Formalism formalism is the view that theoretical information about an object, or practical guidance about how to treat it, are to be derived from attention to its form rather than its matter or content. For the american formalists, the technique of the literary work existed for the sake of discovering its theme. The formalists analyses were far more theoretical, seeking to understand the general nature of literature and literary devices, as well as the historical. Pdf a critical overview of literary criticism in english.
The difference between russian formalism and anglo. A major difference between recent literary theory and earlier critical approaches such as russian formalism, the new criticism, and the first phase of french structuralism is that there has been a shift of emphasis towards the reader in much recent theory. Although the two authors do share certain similarities, namely the citation and comparison of impressionist forerunners and a discussion of cezannes modern qualities, the differences between the two articles do in fact make for complementary opposites. In russian formalism, a differentiation is made between form and content, whereas new criticism does not make such a differentiation, maintaining that texts are unified through their patterns, literary devices, themes, etc. What is the difference between logicism and formalism. The article deals with the interaction of formalism as a trend in language and literature studies, on the one hand, and a teaching method, a technique of teaching to understand and investigate literary text proceeding from its structure and. I believe this might have been wittkowers definition, but i heard it a very long time ago, and cant be su.
A critical overview of literary criticism in english literature. Formalism also known as new criticism a basic approach to reading and understanding literature armstrong atlantic state university formalist theory has dominated the american literary scene for most of the twentieth century, and it has. Any film you see will fit somewhere on that continuum or some scenes in the film might be formalistic, when the rest of the film is realistic. Compare and contrast between russian formalism and the new. Actually, this theory is well known to students because it dominated the study of literature from the 1930s to the 1970s. Reception theory and readerresponse criticism springerlink. The attempt of this school was to make the study of literature more scientific in nature. Is there a conflict in being a formalist and logicist. Both schools americanenglish new criticism and russian formalism are types of formalism. Formalism is primarily concerned with the way that it portrays and communicates different styles and emotions, rather than concentrating on the principal themes that it is representing. Literary criticism new criticism and russian formalism.
What are the basic differences between russian formalism. Russian formalism was a school of literary criticism in russia from the 1910s to the 1930s. Russian formalism and new criticism introduction the field of. What is the difference between literary theory and literary criticism. New criticism was a formalist movement in literary theory that dominated american literary criticism in the middle decades of the 20th century. The american new critics literary theory and criticism. What are the major differences between russian formalism. Difference between structuralism and formalism compare. Opoyaz, an acronym for russian words meaning society for the study of poetic language, founded in 1916 at st. New criticism s humanistic, and russian formalism s scientific base as of their literary critical regard and the different evaluation of literary canon in.
1138 1396 944 86 1382 153 1600 494 1208 526 1409 373 798 649 866 60 1148 1537 800 1648 692 411 1036 810 879 1345 1137 924 597 41